The Wavelet Digest Homepage
Return to the homepage
Search the complete Wavelet Digest database
Help about the Wavelet Digest mailing list
About the Wavelet Digest
The Digest The Community
 Latest Issue  Back Issues  Events  Gallery
The Wavelet Digest
   -> Volume 7, Issue 5

Question: Negative wavelet coefficients
images/spacer.gifimages/spacer.gif Reply into Digest
Previous :: Next  
Author Message (Richard Kerns)

PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 1998 10:21 am    
Subject: Question: Negative wavelet coefficients
Reply with quote

#34 Question: Negative wavelet coefficients

14 April, 1998

Dear Waveleteers,

I recently began learning about Wavelets. I decided to start with
the Haar Wavelet. I obtained a copy of the software package
"Wavelab", which I used with Matlab. I first read about the Haar
functions and the Haar series in a book by K. G. Beauchamp called
"Walsh Functions and their applications" published by Academic Press.

I first tried the function f(x)=1 in the interval from 0 to 1.
Using 64 functional values I obtained 8 for the first Haar coefficient
with the other coefficients being 0. This differs from the value I
had expected by a factor of 8. I understand that this factor of 8
arises as the sqrt. of 64, because I used 64 values. I decided that
in working with wavelab I should change the formula by multiplying by
the norm, which is the sqrt. of the number of functional values used.

I tried another example in the interval from 0 to 1 with
f(x)=2 for x less than 1/2 and f(x) =0 for x greater than 1/2. I
calculated that the first 2 Haar coefficients should be 1 and the rest
0 using the formulae in the book by Beauchamp. When I use 64
functional values to define the function, then I expect using the
changed formula described in the paragraph above, the value 8 for each
of the first two coefficients and 0 for the other coefficients. Using
Wavelab I then found the first coefficient to be 8 as expected, but
the second coefficient was -8. I am not able to explain the negative
sign. After all I had obtained my function by taking the sum of the
first two Haar functions. I would be grateful for any help you may be
be able to give me.
Richard Kerns
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

Jump to: 

disclaimer -
Powered by phpBB

This page was created in 0.024449 seconds : 18 queries executed : GZIP compression disabled