Return to the homepage
Search the complete Wavelet Digest database
Help about the Wavelet Digest mailing list
About the Wavelet Digest
The Wavelet Digest
> Wavelet Discussion Forum
Why is there confusion in the real meaning of the uncertainty principle?


Previous :: Next

Author 
Message 
Alejandro Castillo (jcastillo (at) upb dot edu) Guest

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:26 pm Subject: Why is there confusion in the real meaning of the uncertainty principle? 



Dear all,
For a long time I wonder why the name "Heisenberg uncertainty principle" is common in Wavelet theory if it is not related to quantum physics. I know the REAL meaning of the uncertainty principle (UP). I stress the word "real" because many people confuse the UP of signal analysis with the Heisenberg UP of quantum physic. Even important authors fall in this mistake. Furthermore, I've seen a wavelet books using the wrong name of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle; but showing the correct formulae. Mathematics can constraint physics, but physics can not constraint maths. So my question is: Why so many people confuse the uncertainty principle of timefrequency distributions with the Heisenberg uncertainty principle of quantum physics?
I have the hypothesis that at the beginning of the development of the wavelet theory, some people wrongly tried to draw some similarities between the UP of timefrequency representation with the UP of physics, so they used the name Heisenberg, however nobody care about changing the name or showing the differences. And then people started using correct concepts (or sometimes incorrect concepts) but using a wrong name. Is my hypothesis correct? Am I missing something?
I base my comments on the paper "TimeFrequency representations – a review", Proceedings of the IEEE, by Leon Cohen, pg 970971
Thanks in advance for your answer.
Alejandro Castillo. 





All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Page 1 of 1 
